There are several reasons why a studio or crew may make the unorthodox decision to shoot two movies at the same time or at least one after the other on a set, rather than the more traditional process of filming, wrapping up. , then shooting the film. second later.
On the one hand, it’s cheaper, which eliminates the need to stock or rebuild props and sets; the need to rehire the actors and the team; and any other expenses that may be incurred to suspend filming. On the other hand, it allows films to be finished and produced faster, useful if a studio wants to capitalize on the hype. As a result, several films from different series have been shot this way.
ten Dead Man’s Chest & At World’s End tell a story within the Pirates of the Caribbean franchise
A relatively common occurrence is that film trilogies are shot this way, with the first film being shot, produced and released on its own, and if successful, the second and third being shot at the same time. This partly avoids the risk of a more expensive shoot for two films at a time, as the first can serve as a predictor for the other two.
Pirates of the Caribbean is a notable example, because after the first film tells an almost completely self-contained and completed story, the second and third go straight from one to the other. In an extreme example, Dead man’s chest lacking in real resolve, only Jack and Norrington are given some sort of denouement and most of the storylines come to a halt.
9 Kill Bill Vol. 1 and 2 were originally a feature film
Another common reason two movies are shot at the same time is that they were initially one movie, but the decision to release them in half was made either during filming or in post-production.
The reason is usually that the movie is too long or too disjointed, and the first one happened in Tarantino’s movie. Kill Bill. After the main photography is finished Kill Bill, Tarantino realized that there were more than four hours of material. Even his indulgent nature didn’t release a movie of this length, and instead the movie was released as Volume 1 in 2003, and 2nd volume in 2004.
8 The Millennium series had two films in two months
After the success of the Swedish version of The girl with the dragon tattoo, adaptations of the next two films in the book series, The girl who played with fire and The girl who kicked the hornet’s nest, were shot back to back and almost aired that way, with just two months between their release dates.
Exceptionally, one was better received than the other, with The girl who kicked the hornet’s nest receive mixed reviews compared to the rest positive, despite being filmed as one block.
7 Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows started a YA movie trend
In the late 2000s and early 2010s, a common feature among film adaptations of YA novels was that the final novel was split into two films. Some attributed this to the tendency of the final novel in these series to be longer or more epic, and others attributed it to a desire to sell twice as many tickets.
The first high profile example has arrived Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, a single book that was shorter than some in the series. His film adaptations, although shot simultaneously, were released as two films one year apart, the first in 2010 and the second in 2011.
6 Both parts of Mockingay have been criticized by Hunger Games fans
Another example of the YA trend, the third book of the Hunger games trilogy, Mockingjay, was also filmed simultaneously, but released as two films. The former focused on the rebels’ attempts to save Peeta and spark a revolution, while the latter focused on a more active mission in the Capitol involving Katniss.
Both have been received positively, but have also received criticism for their plot and pace, with some seeing them both as too padded to attempt to expand the story of a book over two long enough films.
5 The Matrix reloaded Segues straight into revolutions
After the resounding success of The matrix, there has been a significant effort in the Expanded Universe, with animated shorts, a video game, and two other films being shot in quick succession. While The facilitator told a collection of stories, the game and the second and third films all told a singular story. Unlike the more spiritual-focused first film, the sequels revolved around the more physical threat of an attack on Zion.
The two The Matrix Reloaded and Matrix revolutions were released four years after the original film, but less than six months apart. Still, it didn’t help many viewers understand their interconnected and convoluted storylines, with none of the films reaching critical or fan appreciation on par with the first.
4 Lord of the Rings took it a step further by making three films at once
Many studios are reluctant to shoot two films back to back, but at the time of The Lord of the Rings to be adapted for live-action, Peter Jackson convinced New Line Cinema to film all three like a single shoot. This reflects the book, which was conceived by Tolkien as one story, divided into three volumes.
The scale of the project was immense, with the main shoot running continuously over fourteen months, with a budget of over $ 280 million. Nonetheless, the effort paid off, with the films being considered one of the best blockbusters of all time. Filming in advance allowed them to be released in quick succession, while filming in sequence could have resulted in long delays.
3 Breaking Dawn continued the YA trend
Another high profile YA release with the final book split into two films, breaking Dawn received polarized reviews for its output structure in that part one was swept aside, but part two was better received. Although from the same book and shot simultaneously, the two films tell very different stories with somewhat contradictory tones.
The former is a moralistic tale in which Bella Swan grapples with a life-threatening vampire pregnancy, while the latter is a more action-oriented play that focuses on the Cullens’ rallying allies to keep them from dying. ‘to be wiped out by the Volturi. The result was Rupture: part 2 being considered one of the best films of the saga, but Part 1 to be considered the worst.
2 Superman and Superman II were filmed back to back, but still took a break
Although these are the first two films in a series, Superman and Superman ii were shot together by director Richard Donner, perhaps leveraging Superman’s name to make sure the two are successful.
Unusual for this trope, there was still a pause in filming when director Richard Donner fell out with the producers about the film, and ultimately filming was halted with the majority of the film finished. When he picked up, Donner did not return, and the film was supplemented with copious amounts recut and re-filmed by Richard Lester.
1 Back to the Future was split during production
Back to the future was initially envisioned as one film, before its success and joking ending created demand for a sequel. The second film in the saga was to have four acts, the fourth of which would take place in the Old West of 1885. However, this structure resulted in a film that was both too long and rushed in pace.
As a result, the fourth act was instead restructured into its own full episode, featuring Marty trying to save Doc before he could be shot in 1885, and the two were filmed back to back. Ultimately, Part III would do better with reviews, but Part IIS’s reputation would become more favorable in the following years, especially among adult fans who grew up with the films.
RELATED: 10 Movies That Were Made As Tax Break & Other Cynical Reasons
Dune and 9 other books that initially had a poor film adaptation (but a good adaptation later)
About the Author